Use of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health to support goal-setting practices in pediatric rehabilitation: a rapid review of the literature
Bibliographic record
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: The International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (referred to as the ICF) is the World Health Organization's framework for health. It can be used to identify goals that capture all aspects of a person's life and to inform clinical goal-setting processes. This review aims to report how healthcare providers are using the ICF framework to support goal-setting practices in pediatric rehabilitation services. METHODS: A rapid review was conducted using scoping review principles in the following databases: CINAHL, Medline and PsycINFO. Key terms included: "ICF", "goal-setting" and "pediatrics". RESULTS: Sixteen studies met the inclusion criteria. Three main themes emerged about the use of the ICF in pediatric rehabilitation: 1) match the content of goals to the ICF domains; 2) implement with existing tools for goal-setting; and 3) inform the development of new tools for goal-setting. Healthcare providers often use a combination of goal-setting tools. The SMART approach is used to frame goals, while the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure and Goal Attainment Scale have been used to document and evaluate goals. CONCLUSION: The ICF framework can be used with current goal-setting practices and offers a common lens and language with which to facilitate collaborative goal-setting with families and healthcare providers.Implications for RehabilitationThe International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) provides a common framework and language to support collaborative goal-setting between families and healthcare providersDespite the opportunity for the ICF to be used as a framework with goal-setting approaches, to date the ICF has mainly been used to match the content of goals to ICF domains for documentation purposesThe ICF should be incorporated into the established clinical routines in order to promote its use among healthcare providersThe ICF can be used with existing goal-setting tools in clinical practice and to inform the ongoing development of new tools to support the goal-setting process in family-centred services.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.012 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".