MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2963275613 · doi:10.1049/el.2013.2222

Improved bounds on restricted isometry constant for orthogonal matching pursuit

2013· article· en· W2963275613 on OpenAlexafffund
Jinming Wen, Xiaomei Zhu, Dongfang Li

Bibliographic record

VenueElectronics Letters · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSparse and Compressive Sensing Techniques
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
FundersFonds de recherche du Québec – Nature et technologiesNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsMatching pursuitIsometry (Riemannian geometry)Constant (computer programming)MathematicsMatching (statistics)Computer scienceCombinatoricsAlgorithmControl theory (sociology)Pure mathematicsArtificial intelligenceStatisticsControl (management)Compressed sensing

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

First, a counter example is constructed to show that for any given positive integer K ≥ 2 and for any (1/√ K + 1) ≤ t < 1, there always exists a K‐ sparse x and a matrix A with the restricted isometry constant δ K +1 = t such that the orthogonal matching pursuit (OMP) algorithm fails in K iterations. Secondly, it is shown that even when δ K + 1 = (1/(√ K + 1)), the OMP algorithm can also perfectly recover every K‐ sparse vector x from y = Ax in K iterations. This improves the best existing results which were independently given by Mo and Shen and Wang and Shim .

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.008
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.066
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.042

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0080.066
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0040.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.002
Bibliometrics0.0030.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.005
Scholarly communication0.0030.011
Open science0.0030.009
Research integrity0.0030.011
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.209
Teacher spread0.202 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations45
Published2013
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueElectronics LettersSame topicSparse and Compressive Sensing TechniquesFrench-language works237,207