Bibliographic record
Abstract
Halfspace depth and $\beta$-skeleton depth are two types of depth functions in nonparametric data analysis. The halfspace depth of a query point $q\in \mathbb{R}^d$ with respect to $S\subset\mathbb{R}^d$ is the minimum portion of the elements of $S$ which are contained in a halfspace which passes through $q$. For $\beta \geq 1$, the $\beta$-skeleton depth of $q$ with respect to $S$ is defined to be the total number of \emph{$\beta$-skeleton influence regions} that contain $q$, where each of these influence regions is the intersection of two hyperballs obtained from a pair of points in $S$. The $\beta$-skeleton depth introduces a family of depth functions that contain \emph{spherical depth} and \emph{lens depth} if $\beta=1$ and $\beta=2$, respectively. The main results of this paper include approximating the planar halfspace depth and $\beta$-skeleton depth using two different approximation methods. First, the halfspace depth is approximated by the $\beta$-skeleton depth values. For this method, two dissimilarity measures based on the concepts of \emph{fitting function} and \emph{Hamming distance} are defined to train the halfspace depth function by the $\beta$-skeleton depth values obtaining from a given data set. The goodness of this approximation is measured by a function of error values. Secondly, computing the planar $\beta$-skeleton depth is reduced to a combination of some range counting problems. Using existing results on range counting approximations, the planar $\beta$-skeleton depth of a query point is approximated in $O(n\;poly(1/\varepsilon,\log n))$, $\beta\geq 1$. Regarding the $\beta$-skeleton depth functions, it is also proved that this family of depth functions converge when $\beta \to \infty$. Finally, some experimental results are provided to support the proposed method of approximation and convergence of $\beta$-skeleton depth functions.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.023 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.008 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.006 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".