MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2963295385 · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1304.3049

Fast-moving finite and infinite trains of solitons for nonlinear\n Schr\\"odinger equations

2013· article· W2963295385 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenuearXiv (Cornell University) · 2013
Typearticle
Language
FieldMathematics
TopicAdvanced Mathematical Physics Problems
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsUniquenessTrainSolitonNonlinear systemInfinityZero (linguistics)Schrödinger's catNonlinear Schrödinger equationNeighbourhood (mathematics)MathematicsPhysicsFinite setMathematical analysisQuantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We study *infinite soliton trains* solutions of nonlinear Schr\\"odinger\nequations (NLS), i.e. solutions behaving at large time as the sum of infinitely\nmany solitary waves. Assuming the composing solitons have sufficiently large\nrelative speeds, we prove the existence and uniqueness of such a soliton train.\nWe also give a new construction of multi-solitons (i.e. finite trains) and\nprove uniqueness in an exponentially small neighborhood, and we consider the\ncase of solutions composed of several solitons and kinks (i.e. solutions with a\nnon-zero background at infinity).\n

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.765
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.117
GPT teacher head0.233
Teacher spread0.116 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it