MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2963297536 · doi:10.1111/rssc.12373

A Hidden Semi-Markov Model for Characterizing Regime Shifts in Ocean Density Variability

2019· article· en· W2963297536 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Theo Economou, Matthew Menary

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C (Applied Statistics) · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicClimate variability and models
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsClimatologyTemperature salinity diagramsMarkov chainMarkov chain Monte CarloBayesian probabilityPrecipitationStatistical physicsEnvironmental scienceGeologySalinityMeteorologyStatisticsOceanographyMathematicsGeographyPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Summary Societally important decadal predictions of temperature and precipitation over Europe are largely affected by variability in the North Atlantic Ocean. Within this region, the Labrador Sea is of particular importance because of its link between surface-driven density variability and the Atlantic meridional overturning circulation. Using physical justifications, we propose a statistical model to describe the temporal variability of ocean density in terms of salinity-driven and temperature-driven density. This is a hidden semi-Markov model that allows for either a salinity-driven or a temperature-driven ocean density regime, such that the persistence in each regime is governed probabilistically by a semi-Markov chain. The model is fitted in the Bayesian framework, and a reversible jump Markov chain Monte Carlo algorithm is proposed to deal with a single-regime scenario. The model is first applied to a reanalysis data set, where model checking measures are also proposed. Then it is applied to data from 43 climate models to investigate whether and how ocean density variability differs between them and also the reanalysis data. Parameter estimates relating to the mean holding time for each regime are used to establish a link between regime behaviour and the Atlantic meridional overturning circulation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.520
Threshold uncertainty score0.879

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.228
Teacher spread0.217 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C (Applied Statistics)Same topicClimate variability and modelsFrench-language works237,207