MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2963333726 · doi:10.3968/11149

Deliberate Misinterpretation of My Fair Lady and Its Pragmatic Analysis in Ironical Context

2019· article· en· W2963333726 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Yayan Yu

Bibliographic record

VenueStudies in literature and language · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicLanguage, Discourse, Communication Strategies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsContext (archaeology)Interpersonal communicationRelevance (law)Relevance theoryPsychologyFace (sociological concept)Process (computing)PragmaticsInterpersonal interactionOrder (exchange)EpistemologyLinguisticsSocial psychologyCognitive psychologyComputer sciencePhilosophyPolitical scienceCognitionNeuroscience

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper aims to analyze the deliberate misinterpretation in ironical context and its pragmatic effects by the Relevance Theory. Deliberate misinterpretation is a usual communicative method in interpersonal communication. According to different context, there will be different pragmatic effects. During the process of communication, in order to realize some special goals, the speakers use some contexts and some ambiguous expressions to misinterpret others on purpose. In ironical context, the speakers’ expressions are misinterpreted to satisfy some special purposes, which will make several pragmatic effects, including protecting self-images or face-saving, relax the atmosphere and avoid confliction.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.100
Threshold uncertainty score0.369

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.316
Teacher spread0.297 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueStudies in literature and languageSame topicLanguage, Discourse, Communication StrategiesFrench-language works237,207