MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2963343608

1 SIGN CHANGES OF THE LIOUVILLE FUNCTION ON QUADRATICS

2016· article· en· W2963343608 on OpenAlexaff
Peter Borwein, Himadri Ganguli

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicHistory and Theory of Mathematics
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMathematicsSign (mathematics)Integer (computer science)Prime (order theory)Function (biology)PolynomialSign functionCombinatoricsPure mathematicsDiscrete mathematicsMathematical analysis
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Let $\lambda (n)$ denote the Liouville function. Complementary to the prime number theorem, Chowla conjectured that \vspace{1mm} \noindent {\bf Conjecture (Chowla).} {\em \begin{equation} \label{a.1} \sum_{n\le x} \lambda (f(n)) =o(x) \end{equation} for any polynomial $f(x)$ with integer coefficients which is not of form $bg(x)^2$. } \vspace{1mm} \noindent The prime number theorem is equivalent to \eqref{a.1} when $f(x)=x$. Chowla's conjecture is proved for linear functions but for the degree greater than 1, the conjecture seems to be extremely hard and still remains wide open. One can consider a weaker form of Chowla's conjecture, namely, \vspace{1mm} \noindent {\bf Conjecture 1 (Cassaigne, et al).} {\em If $f(x) \in \Z [x]$ and is not in the form of $bg^2(x)$ for some $g(x)\in \Z[x]$, then $\lambda (f(n))$ changes sign infinitely often.} Clearly, Chowla's conjecture implies Conjecture 1. Although it is weaker, Conjecture 1 is still wide open for polynomials of degree $>1$. In this article, we study Conjecture 1 for the quadratic polynomials. One of our main theorems is {\bf Theorem 1.} {\em Let $f(x) = ax^2+bx +c $ with $a>0$ and $l$ be a positive integer such that $al$ is not a perfect square. Then if the equation $f(n)=lm^2 $ has one solution $(n_0,m_0) \in \Z^2$, then it has infinitely many positive solutions $(n,m) \in \N^2$.} As a direct consequence of Theorem 1, we prove some partial results of Conjecture 1 for quadratic polynomials are also proved by using Theorem 1.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.027

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.003
Scholarly communication0.0020.003
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.053
GPT teacher head0.262
Teacher spread0.209 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicHistory and Theory of MathematicsFrench-language works237,207