MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Repertório de protesto indígena: análise histórica a partir das mobilizações dos povos de Cauca (Colômbia)

2019· article· pt· W2963362663 on OpenAlexaff
Elizabeth Del Socorro Ruano Ibarra

Bibliographic record

VenueEstudos Ibero-Americanos · 2019
Typearticle
Languagept
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicLatin American Cultural Politics
Canadian institutionsContinental (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolitical scienceHumanitiesArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Por meio de uma análise da Minga, protesto realizado em 2008, este estudo visa problematizar o repertório indígena nas mobilizações indígenas contemporâneas em Cauca, na Colômbia. Em diálogo com o debate acadêmico, que destaca a dimensão política dessas mobilizações, se revisaram fontes documentais, observaram algumas manifestações indígenas e realizaram entrevistas com lideranças desses protestos. O trabalho revelou que historicidade e territorialidade são categorias centrais desse repertório. Os discursos colocam em evidência disputas políticas por legitimidade tanto das reivindicações quanto dos mecanismos estatais de contenção.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.224
Threshold uncertainty score0.445

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0050.007
Science and technology studies0.0050.004
Scholarly communication0.0060.002
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.332
Teacher spread0.304 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEstudos Ibero-AmericanosSame topicLatin American Cultural PoliticsFrench-language works237,207