MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2963373196 · doi:10.1139/cjp-2015-0294

Particle creation with excited de Sitter modes

2015· article· en· W2963373196 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
M. Mohsenzadeh, E. Yusofi, Mohammad Reza Tanhayi

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Physics · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicCosmology and Gravitation Theories
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersIslamic Azad University
KeywordsPhysicsDe Sitter spaceDe Sitter universede Sitter invariant special relativityMinkowski spacede Sitter–Schwarzschild metricMathematical physicsNonlinear systemAnti-de Sitter spaceExcited stateLimit (mathematics)Space (punctuation)Quantum mechanicsClassical mechanicsQuantum electrodynamicsSpacetimeMathematical analysisUniverse

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Recently, we introduced exited de Sitter modes to study the power spectrum that was finite in Krein space quantization and the trans-Plankian corrections because of the exited mode being nonlinear (M. Mohsenzadeh et al. Eur. Phys. J. C, 74, 2920 (2014) doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-014-2920-5 ). It was shown that the de Sitter limit of corrections reduces to that obtained via several previous conventional methods; moreover, with such modes the space–time symmetry becomes manifest. In this paper, inspired by the Krein method and using exited de Sitter modes as the fundamental initial states during the inflation, we calculate particle creation in the spatially flat Robertson–Walker space–time. It is shown that in de Sitter and Minkowski space–time in the far past time limit, our results coincide with the standard results.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.235
Teacher spread0.220 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations12
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of PhysicsSame topicCosmology and Gravitation TheoriesFrench-language works237,207