Crystal structures of the synthetic intermediate 3-[(6-chloro-7<i>H</i>-purin-7-yl)methyl]cyclobutan-1-one, and of two oxetanocin derivatives: 3-[(6-chloro-8,9-dihydro-7<i>H</i>-purin-7-yl)methyl]cyclobutan-1-ol and 3-[(6-chloro-9<i>H</i>-purin-9-yl)methyl]cyclobutan-1-ol
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The crystal structures of an intermediate, C10H9ClN4O, 3-[(6-chloro-7H-purin-7-yl)methyl]cyclobutan-1-one (I), and two N-7 and N-9 regioisomeric oxetanocin nucleoside analogs, C10H13ClN4O, 3-[(6-chloro-8,9-dihydro-7H-purin-7-yl)methyl]cyclobutan-1-ol (II) and C10H11ClN4O, 3-[(6-chloro-9H-purin-9-yl)methyl]cyclobutan-1-ol (IV), are reported. The crystal structures of the nucleoside analogs confirmed the reduction of the N-7- and N-9-substituted cyclobutanones with LiAl(OtBu)3 to occur with facial selectivity, yielding cis-nucleosides analogs similar to those found in nature. Reduction of the purine ring of the N-7 cyclobutanone to a dihydropurine was observed for compound (II) but not for the purine ring of the N-9 cyclobutanone on formation of compound (IV). In the crystal of (I), molecules are linked by a weak Cl...O interaction, forming a 21 helix along [010]. The helices are linked by offset π–π interactions [intercentroid distance = 3.498 (1) Å], forming layers parallel to (101). In the crystal of (II), molecules are linked by pairs of O—H...N hydrogen bonds, forming inversion dimers with an R 2 2(8) ring motif. The dimers are linked by O—H...N hydrogen bonds, forming chains along [001], which in turn are linked by C—H...π and offset π–π interactions [intercentroid distance = 3.509 (1) Å], forming slabs parallel to the ac plane. In the crystal of (IV), molecules are linked by O—H...N hydrogen bonds, forming chains along [101]. The chains are linked by C—H...N and C—H...O hydrogen bonds and C—H...π and offset π–π interactions [intercentroid distance = 3.364 (1) Å], forming a supramolecular framework.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".