Bibliographic record
Abstract
La communication proposée voudrait montrer la trajectoire des flux scientifiques et leurs liens avec les échanges économiques, les migrations et les transferts culturels. Le traitement du sujet s’insère dans une perspective d’histoire globale, c’est-à-dire une approche qui étudie les modes d’interaction entre les sociétés au-delà des espaces étatiques, qui met l’accent sur les processus de convergence et qui examine les transferts entre zones culturelles. On envisagera ici les idées scientifiques comme des flux immatériels et on examinera les modalités de leur construction, leur appropriation, leur matérialisation et leur circulation dans des lieux de savoir autour de la Méditerranée entre les Xe et XIVe siècles. Pour ce faire, on ne se penchera que sur quelques-unes des communautés savantes qui ont favorisé leur diffusion. On fera l’examen d’un axe particulier de ces transferts culturels, celui qui part de l’Espagne almohade et qui chemine vers le nord. Pour terminer, on verra la réception de ces flux par la communauté savante de la ville de Montpellier au tournant du XIVe siècle.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.008 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.012 | 0.008 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.010 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".