MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2963465513 · doi:10.1093/jas/skz196

The effects of a temporary lysine restriction in newly weaned pigs on growth performance and body composition1

2019· article· en· W2963465513 on OpenAlexafffund
Adam D. Totafurno, Lee‐Anne Huber, Wilfredo D Mansilla, D. Wey, I. B. Mandell, C. F. M. de Lange

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Animal Science · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicAnimal Nutrition and Physiology
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Guelph
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaOntario Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural AffairsSwine Innovation PorcOntario Pork
KeywordsAnimal scienceWeaningBiologyBody weightEndocrinology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A serial slaughter study was conducted to determine the effects of a temporary Lys restriction immediately following weaning on growth performance and body composition. One hundred forty-four Yorkshire × Landrace × Duroc pigs (initial BW: 6.9 ± 0.2 kg) were randomly allocated to one of three dietary treatments (six pens per treatment with eight pigs per pen; four barrows and four gilts). For a 3-wk restriction period, pigs were fed diets that were 110% (Control) of the estimated required standardized ileal digestible (SID) Lys for nursery pigs or 20% (Lys20) or 40% (Lys40) below the estimated required SID Lys. Thereafter, all pigs were fed a common grower diet containing 120% of the estimated required SID Lys for 6 wk (recovery period). During the restriction period, ADG and G:F decreased with decreasing dietary Lys concentration (linear; P < 0.01). At the end of the restriction period, BW and whole-body protein concentrations decreased (linear; P < 0.01) and carcass lipid concentrations increased (linear; P < 0.01) with decreasing dietary Lys concentration. During the first 3 wk of the recovery period, ADG and G:F increased (linear; P < 0.05 and P < 0.01, respectively) and whole-body protein concentration at week 3 of the recovery period decreased (linear; P < 0.01) with decreasing dietary Lys concentration. There were no dietary treatment differences in whole-body lipid concentration after 3 wk of the recovery period. During the second half of the recovery period (weeks 7 through 9), there were no differences in ADG or G:F; after week 6, there were no differences in final BW (50.3 ± 0.5 kg) or whole-body protein (16.9 ± 0.2%) or lipid (14.9 ± 0.7%) concentrations. In conclusion, newly weaned pigs previously fed a Lys-limiting diet for 3 wk immediately after weaning achieved full compensatory growth with no differences in BW or body composition after a 6-wk recovery period. Reducing dietary Lys concentration early after weaning is a potential means to reduce the cost of (early) nursery diets without impacting overall growth and carcass composition.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.947
Threshold uncertainty score0.110

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.212
Teacher spread0.205 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2019
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Animal ScienceSame topicAnimal Nutrition and PhysiologyFrench-language works237,207