Interpolation and extrapolation of global potential energy surfaces for polyatomic systems by Gaussian processes with composite kernels
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Gaussian process regression has recently emerged as a powerful, system-agnostic tool for building global potential energy surfaces (PES) of polyatomic molecules. While the accuracy of GP models of PES increases with the number of potential energy points, so does the numerical difficulty of training and evaluating GP models. Here, we demonstrate an approach to improve the accuracy of global PES without increasing the number of energy points. The present work reports four important results. First, we show that the selection of the best kernel function for GP models of PES can be automated using the Bayesian information criterion as a model selection metric. Second, we demonstrate that GP models of PES trained by a small number of energy points can be significantly improved by iteratively increasing the complexity of GP kernels. The composite kernels thus obtained maximize the accuracy of GP models for a given distribution of potential energy points. Third, we show that the accuracy of the GP models of PES with composite kernels can be further improved by varying the training point distributions. Fourth, we show that GP models with composite kernels can be used for physical extrapolation of PES. We illustrate the approach by constructing the six-dimensional PES for H$_3$O$^+$. For the interpolation problem, we show that this algorithm produces a global six-dimensional PES for H$_3$O$^+$ in the energy range between zero and $21,000$ cm$^{-1}$ with the root mean square error $65.8$ cm$^{-1}$ using only 500 randomly selected {\it ab initio} points as input. To illustrate extrapolation, we produce the PES at high energies using the energy points at low energies as input. We show that one can obtain an accurate global fit of the PES extending to $21,000$ cm$^{-1}$ based on 1500 potential energy points at energies below $10,000$ cm$^{-1}$.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".