Multi-Valued Collaborative Qos Prediction for Cloud Service Via Time Series Analysis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Aiming at the diversity of user features, the uncertainty and the variation characteristics of quality of service (QoS), by exploiting the continuous monitoring data of cloud services, this paper proposes a multi-valued collaborative approach to predict the unknown QoS values via time series analysis for potential users. In this approach, the multi-valued QoS evaluations consisting of single-value data and time series data from consumers are transformed into cloud models, and the differences between potential users and other consumers in every period are measured based on these cloud models. Against the deficiency of existing methods of similarity measurement between cloud models, this paper presents a new vector comparison method combining the orientation similarity and dimension similarity to improve the precision of similarity calculation. The fuzzy analytic hierarchy process method is used to help potential users determine the objective weight of every period, and the neighboring users are selected for the potential user according to their comprehensive similarities of QoS evaluations in multiple periods. By incorporating the multi-valued QoS evaluations with the objective weights among multiple periods, the predicted results can remain consistent with the periodic variations of QoS. Finally, the experiments based on a real-world dataset demonstrate that this approach can provide high accuracy of collaborative QoS prediction for multi-valued evaluations in the cloud computing paradigm.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".