MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Exponential Convergence to Equilibrium in Cellular Automata Asymptotically Emulating Identity

2014· article· en· W2963577935 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueComplex Systems · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicCellular Automata and Applications
Canadian institutionsBrock University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsConjectureMathematicsClass (philosophy)GeneralityCellular automatonIdentity (music)Convergence (economics)Simple (philosophy)Applied mathematicsEquilibrium pointExponential functionDiscrete mathematicsPure mathematicsComputer scienceMathematical analysisAlgorithmDifferential equationPhysicsArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We consider the problem of finding the density of 1's in a configuration obtained by $n$ iterations of a given cellular automaton (CA) rule, starting from disordered initial condition. While this problems is intractable in full generality for a general CA rule, we argue that for some sufficiently simple classes of rules it is possible to express the density in terms of elementary functions. Rules asymptotically emulating identity are one example of such a class, and density formulae have been previously obtained for several of them. We show how to obtain formulae for density for two further rules in this class, 160 and 168, and postulate likely expression for density for eight other rules. Our results are valid for arbitrary initial density. Finally, we conjecture that the density of 1's for CA rules asymptotically emulating identity always approaches the equilibrium point exponentially fast.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.973
Threshold uncertainty score0.980

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.272
Teacher spread0.242 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it