MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2963581585 · doi:10.1109/iwcmc.2019.8766634

Embedding Multiple-Step-Ahead Traffic Prediction in Network Energy Efficiency Problem

2019· article· en· W2963581585 on OpenAlexafffund
Abdolkhalegh Bayati, Kim Khoa Nguyen, Mohamed Cheriet

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicNetwork Traffic and Congestion Control
Canadian institutionsÉcole de Technologie Supérieure
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanada Research Chairs
KeywordsComputer scienceEnergy consumptionLinear programmingSimulated annealingEfficient energy useTraffic flow (computer networking)Mathematical optimizationTraffic generation modelInteger programmingHeuristicReal-time computingAlgorithmComputer networkEngineeringMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Adaptive Link Rate (ALR) is widely used to save energy consumption of network by adjusting the link rate according to the carried traffic through a network-level optimization of the flow allocation process. Existing ALR solution is mainly reactive, in which link speed is changed only when new traffic demand is requested. Also, they focus on energy consumption, and do not consider the cost of changes in the network (e.g., change in traffic routes, and link rates). Once bandwidth has been allocated for a demand, the link rate remains constant during the entire session. Therefore, this solution may result in sub-optimal schemes and requires multiple re-optimizations as traffic flows are fluctuating during the session, hence reducing the overall network performance. In this paper, we improve the ALR with a multiple-step-ahead method to optimize link rates based on forecasting traffic demand predictively. We formulate the proposed Predictive ALR (PALR) as an Integer Linear Programming (ILP) model and then design a heuristic simulated annealing (SA) -based algorithm to solve it. Our experimental results show our approach provides energy saving while it decreases on average 18% of link state transition and 11% of the flow reroutings compared to the original ALR.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.915
Threshold uncertainty score0.723

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.203
Teacher spread0.197 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2019
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicNetwork Traffic and Congestion ControlFrench-language works237,207