MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2963587408 · doi:10.1007/s11139-016-9879-9

Some q-congruences for homogeneous and quasi-homogeneous multiple q-harmonic sums

2017· article· en· W2963587408 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueCineca Institutional Research Information System (Tor Vergata University) · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicAdvanced Mathematical Identities
Canadian institutionsFields Institute for Research in Mathematical Sciences
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCongruence relationMathematicsHomogeneousConjectureHarmonicDuality (order theory)Pure mathematicsHarmonic numberCombinatoricsPhysicsQuantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We show some new Wolstenholme type q-congruences for some classes of multiple q-harmonic sums of arbitrary depth with strings of indices composed of ones, twos, and threes. Most of these results are q-extensions of the corresponding congruences for ordinary multiple harmonic sums obtained by the authors in a previous paper. We also establish duality congruences for multiple q-harmonic non-strict sums and a kind of duality for multiple q-harmonic strict sums. Finally, we pose a conjecture concerning two kinds of cyclic sums of multiple q-harmonic sums.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.620
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.004
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.152
GPT teacher head0.359
Teacher spread0.207 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it