CURRENT SITUATION OF AGRICULTURAL ENTERPRISES FINANCING IN UKRAINE: ECONOMIC AND LEGAL ANALYSIS
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Modern agriculture is developed in the direction of increasing the efficiency of agricultural production. This requires a stable combination of financial and economic, legal and organizational factors with the mandatory introduction of the innovative component.Scientific research is based on the current information and scientific base which contains a methodology for assessing the effectiveness of raising funds, the use of which allows systematizing a number of phenomena in the process of agricultural development, unifying the procedure for determining the nominal volumes and effectiveness of welfare payment using direct methods.The paper deals with some problematic legal issues of legal regulation of financial relations with the participation of agricultural enterprises; it is determined and justified the necessity of allocation of agricultural enterprises financial support, providing the administrative assistance and control over the target use of the given funds. The main articles of agricultural enterprises support in Ukraine were identified and the main generators of these enterprises financing were determined from the position of financial and credit institutions.The conceptual models of state support for the development of rural areas in Canada, Australia, Italy and the United States of America are analyzed. The main reasons for the unsatisfactory state of agricultural enterprises development, in particular, economic, social, infrastructural, administrative, problems that restrain the development of the agrarian sector as a whole are outlined. The necessary conditions for the development of agricultural enterprises in Ukraine are determined. On the basis of the analysis of world experience of rural development policy, a list of directions of agrarian sector enterprises support necessary for activation of rural areas development in Ukraine has been formed.The actuality and necessity of activation and harmonization using qualitatively new methodological dimensions of agricultural enterprises financing of various forms of ownership outlined the purpose of scientific search, its contour, tasks and architectonics.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".