A nonlinearly preconditioned conjugate gradient algorithm for rank‐<i>R</i> canonical tensor approximation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Summary Alternating least squares (ALS) is often considered the workhorse algorithm for computing the rank‐R canonical tensor approximation, but for certain problems, its convergence can be very slow. The nonlinear conjugate gradient (NCG) method was recently proposed as an alternative to ALS, but the results indicated that NCG is usually not faster than ALS. To improve the convergence speed of NCG, we consider a nonlinearly preconditioned NCG (PNCG) algorithm for computing the rank‐R canonical tensor decomposition. Our approach uses ALS as a nonlinear preconditioner in the NCG algorithm. Alternatively, NCG can be viewed as an acceleration process for ALS. We demonstrate numerically that the convergence acceleration mechanism in PNCG often leads to important pay‐offs for difficult tensor decomposition problems, with convergence that is significantly faster and more robust than for the stand‐alone NCG or ALS algorithms. We consider several approaches for incorporating the nonlinear preconditioner into the NCG algorithm that have been described in the literature previously and have met with success in certain application areas. However, it appears that the nonlinearly PNCG approach has received relatively little attention in the broader community and remains underexplored both theoretically and experimentally. Thus, this paper serves several additional functions, by providing in one place a concise overview of several PNCG variants and their properties that have only been described in a few places scattered throughout the literature, by systematically comparing the performance of these PNCG variants for the tensor decomposition problem, and by drawing further attention to the usefulness of nonlinearly PNCG as a general tool. In addition, we briefly discuss the convergence of the PNCG algorithm. In particular, we obtain a new convergence result for one of the PNCG variants under suitable conditions, building on known convergence results for non‐preconditioned NCG. Copyright © 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".