MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2963626746 · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201220582

CALIFA, the Calar Alto Legacy Integral Field Area survey

2012· article· en· W2963626746 on OpenAlexaff
B. Husemann, K. Jahnkę, S. F. Sánchez, D. Barrado, S. Bekerait error ė, D. J. Bomans, Á. Castillo-Morales, C. Catalán-Torrecilla, R. Cid Fernandes, J. Falcón‐Barroso, R. García-Benito, R. M. González Delgado, J. Iglésias-Páramo, Benjamin D. Johnson, D. Kupko, R. López-Fernández, M. Lyubenova, R. A. Marino, D. Mast, A. Miskolczi, A. Monreal‐Ibero, A. Gil de Paz, E. Pérez, Isabel Pérez, F. F. Rosales-Ortega, T. Ruiz-Lara, U. Schilling, Glenn van de Ven, Jakob Walcher, J. Alves, A. L. de Amorim, N. Backsmann, J. K. Barrera-Ballesteros, Joss Bland‐Hawthorn, C. Cortijo-Ferrero, R.‐J. Dettmar, Markus Demleitner, Á. I. Díaz, H. Enke, E. Florido, H. Flores, L. Galbany, Anna Gallazzi, B. García‐Lorenzo, J. M. Gomes, N. Gruel, Tim Haines, Lewis Holmes, B. Jungwiert, V. Kalinova, C. Kehrig, R. C. Kennicutt, Jochen Klar, M. D. Lehnert, Á. R. López-Sánchez, A. de Lorenzo-Cáceres, E. Mármol-Queraltó, I. Márquez, J. Méndez‐Abreu, M. Mollá, A. del Olmo, Sharon E. Meidt, P. Papaderos, Johannes Puschnig, A. Quirrenbach, Martin M. Roth, P. Sánchez–Blázquez, K. Spekkens, Raj Laxmi Singh, V. Stanishev, S. C. Trager, J. M. Vı́lchez, Vivienne Wild, L. Wisotzki, S. Zibetti, B. Ziegler

Bibliographic record

VenueAstronomy and Astrophysics · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicGamma-ray bursts and supernovae
Canadian institutionsRoyal Military College of Canada
FundersH2020 European Research CouncilFundação para a Ciência e a TecnologiaLeibniz-GemeinschaftJet Propulsion LaboratoryMax-Planck-Institut für AstronomieInstituto de Astrofísica de AndalucíaMinistério da Ciência, Tecnologia e Ensino SuperiorMinisterio de Ciencia e InnovaciónAkademie Věd České RepublikyMax-Planck-GesellschaftMinisterio de Economía y CompetitividadConselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e TecnológicoNational Aeronautics and Space AdministrationCoordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível SuperiorDanmarks GrundforskningsfondU.S. Department of EnergyCalifornia Institute of TechnologyDeutsche ForschungsgemeinschaftScience and Technology Facilities CouncilNational Research FoundationAlfred P. Sloan FoundationJunta de AndalucíaNational Science Foundation
KeywordsPhysicsAstrophysicsField (mathematics)Astronomy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We present the first public data release (DR1) of the Calar Alto Legacy Integral Field Area (CALIFA) survey. It consists of science-grade optical datacubes for the first 100 of eventually 600 nearby (0.005 < z < 0.03) galaxies, obtained with the integral-field spectrograph PMAS/PPak mounted on the 3.5 m telescope at the Calar Alto observatory. The galaxies in DR1 already cover a wide range of properties in color–magnitude space, morphological type, stellar mass, and gas ionization conditions. This offers the potential to tackle a variety of open questions in galaxy evolution using spatially resolved spectroscopy. Two different spectral setups are available for each galaxy, (i) a low-resolution V500 setup covering the nominal wavelength range 3745–7500 Å with a spectral resolution of 6.0 Å (FWHM), and (ii) a medium-resolution V1200 setup covering the nominal wavelength range 3650–4840 Å with a spectral resolution of 2.3 Å (FWHM). We present the characteristics and data structure of the CALIFA datasets that should be taken into account for scientific exploitation of the data, in particular the effects of vignetting, bad pixels and spatially correlated noise. The data quality test for all 100 galaxies showed that we reach a median limiting continuum sensitivity of 1.0 × 10-18 erg s-1 cm-2 Å-1 arcsec-2 at 5635 Å and 2.2 × 10-18 erg s-1 cm-2 Å-1 arcsec-2 at 4500 Å for the V500 and V1200 setup respectively, which corresponds to limiting r and g band surface brightnesses of 23.6 mag arcsec-2 and 23.4 mag arcsec-2, or an unresolved emission-line flux detection limit of roughly 1 × 10-17 erg s-1 cm-2 arcsec-2 and 0.6 × 10-17 erg s-1 cm-2 arcsec-2, respectively. The median spatial resolution is 37, and the absolute spectrophotometric calibration is better than 15% (1σ). We also describe the available interfaces and tools that allow easy access to this first publicCALIFA data at http://califa.caha.es/DR1.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.324
Threshold uncertainty score0.812

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.228
Teacher spread0.212 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations249
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAstronomy and AstrophysicsSame topicGamma-ray bursts and supernovaeFrench-language works237,207