MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

P062 Crohn's disease presenting as fever of unknown origin in a six-year-old male

2019· article· en· W2963671051 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Michelle Rosario, Elimarys Perez-Colon

Bibliographic record

VenueThe American Journal of Gastroenterology · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAutoimmune and Inflammatory Disorders Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineAbdominal painLeukocytosisGastroenterologyInternal medicineAbdomenMicrocytic anemiaPathologyAnemiaDermatologySurgery

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Inflammatory Bowel Diseases (IBD) are rising in incidence in the pediatric population. While most present classically, some have limited findings. We present a case of pediatric Crohn's Disease (CD) diagnosed during a fever of unknown origin (FUO) evaluation. We aim to stress the importance of uncommon presentations of a diagnosis with significant implications and requiring prompt intervention. CASE: A 6-year-old male presented with 2 weeks of evening 104–106 F fevers, weakness, decreased intake, and weight loss. He also had one loose, non-mucous, non-bloody stool daily. Fevers failed to resolve with outpatient courses of antibiotics and CRP continued to rise. History revealed camping in North Carolina 2 weeks preceding symptom onset. Family history was unremarkable. No further symptoms, including abdominal pain, were elicited. Exam exhibited fever, tachycardia, tachypnea, uvular and palatal ulcers, dry mucous membranes, cervical, submandibular and inguinal lymphadenopathy. No skin, eye, joint, perianal or abdominal findings observed. Preliminary labs showed hypoalbuminemia (2.6), elevated CRP (7.4) and ESR (55), mild leukocytosis (14.9), and microcytic anemia (Hgb 10.1, MCV 71.8). An extensive FUO evaluation failed to identify a source and thus imaging was pursued. CT abdomen/pelvis showed terminal ileitis and free fluid along the right paracolic gutter and right hepatic margin. Endoscopic evaluation for IBD discovered esophagitis along with ulcerations, edema and friable mucosa in the terminal ileum. Pathology was significant for active chronic lymphoplasmacytic gastritis with eosinophils and subtle early granulomatous inflammation with multinucleated giant cells. Distal esophagus showed chronically active inflammation and lymphocytic esophagitis without granulomas. Terminal ileum biopsy revealed active, chronic granulomatous ileitis with ulceration and granulation. No organisms noted throughout. He was diagnosed with CD and initiated on steroids along with Mesalamine. DISCUSSION: One quarter of IBD is diagnosed by the age of 20, with 4% presenting before 5 and 18% before 10 years of age. Recent incidence reports show combined U.S. and Canadian data of 10 per 100,000. Prevalence in the U.S. alone is 100–200 per 100,000. Furthermore, IBD in those less than ten is becoming more common. With recent therapeutic advances, significant morbidity and mortality is preventable. However, treatment delays occur from a diagnostic lag in 20% when symptoms are ambiguous. This case highlights early onset IBD and brings attention to non-classic presentations. Our patient was diagnosed 1.5 months after initial symptoms. An average diagnosis lag time of about 3.4 months in pediatric CD has been documented, with further delay if pre-existing gastrointestinal symptoms exist (26 months). Whereas CD is considered when abdominal pain, diarrhea, and weight loss are identified, our patient presented with daily fever along with oral lesions, lymphadenopathy and weight loss. A few case reports cite FUO, another difficult and often unclear diagnosis, as the presentation for IBD. Fever as the sole initial symptom for IBD occurs in 10-15% of cases. IBD is a complicated illness, especially in the pediatric population. When considering effects on growth, psychosocial development and the long-term complications, we must consider IBD in the differential of pediatric patients with vague and persistent symptoms including FUO.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.607

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.288
Teacher spread0.277 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe American Journal of GastroenterologySame topicAutoimmune and Inflammatory Disorders ResearchFrench-language works237,207