Incongruências entre moradia e mobilidade: conjuntos de habitação popular e o sistema BRT em Curitiba
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
O artigo analisa a desconexão entre localização de moradia popular e acessibilidade aos sistemas de mobilidade, focalizando o sistema BRT de transporte coletivo de Curitiba, para compreender as desigualdades socioespaciais. Questionam-se as condições de acesso ao sistema de transporte para os usuários que residem nos conjuntos habitacionais populares produzidos pela Companhia de Habitação Popular de Curitiba –COHAB CT. Os procedimentos metodológicos incluem revisão do marco teórico; definição de categorias de análise e recorte empírico; fase exploratória em campo e análises qualitativo-quantitativas dos resultados com uso de programas de desenho computadorizado, geoprocessamento e planilhas quantitativas, segundo método hipotético-dedutivo. Analisou-se características socioespaciais da distribuição dos conjuntos habitacionais entre 1965 e 2015 e a disponibilidade de infraestrutura relativa à mobilidade e condições sociais. As conclusões explicitam um quadro de exclusão relativa ao sistema de transporte, evidenciada pela distância às centralidades dos terminais, e por um conjunto de precariedades do espaço físico e socioambiental. The article focuses on disconnected conditions between popular housing location and accessibility to mobility systems, focusing on the BRT system of mass transit in Curitiba, in order to understand social and spatial inequalities. Accessibility to the transportation system is questioned for those living in housing complexes produced by the Popular Housing Company of Curitiba -COHAB CT. The methodological procedures include revision of the theoretical framework; definition of categories of analysis and empirical clipping; exploratory field work and qualitative-quantitative analysis about the results of computerized drawing programs using, geoprocessing and quantitative worksheets, according to the hypothetical-deductive method. It has beenanalyzed socio-spatial characteristics of the distribution of COHAB CT settlements between 1965 and 2015 and the availability of infrastructure related to mobility and social conditions. The conclusions point to an exclusion situation regarding the transportation system, showed by the distance to terminals centrality, and by a set of physical and socio-environmental precariousness of space.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it