MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W296369917

Work in Mexico

2004· article· en· W296369917 on OpenAlex
Roberto Cortéz González

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Career Planning and Adult Development Journal · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEducation and Labor Relations
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPopulationImmigrationCensusIndigenousEducational attainmentGarciaPoliticsGeographyLatin AmericansPolitical scienceEconomic growthDevelopment economicsDemographySociologyEconomicsHumanities
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract In this article, several interrelated factors that influence occupational development opportunities in Mexico [Figure 1] are discussed. First, relevant demographic information from 1995 Mexican census is presented. Particular emphasis is given to age, ethnicity, and increased urbanization. Second, recent economic and political developments are considered. Mexico's post-World War II economic miracle finally went bust with peso devaluation in December 1994. On January 1 of that year, North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) with U.S.A., Canada, and Mexico went into effect. That same day, an armed uprising in southern state of Chiapas drew worldwide attention to Mexico's disenfranchised indigenous peoples. Recently, seventy years of one-party, national rule has come to an end in Mexico, leaving great uncertainty about future. Third, research on pervasive gender and social class differences in educational attainment and occupational achievement is examined. Finally, inextricable link between work in Mexico and U. S. immigration policy is discussed. Introduction Demographics, pure and simple, have had and will continue to have a huge impact on occupational development in Mexico. According to The World Almanac and Book of Facts (2001), United Mexican States [Estados Unidos Mexicanos, E.U.M.], as Mexico is officially known, had a population of 100.4 million people as of 1995. This represents an explosive 66 per cent rate of growth from 1975 (Cortes, 1980). Mexico's population is predominantly young, with 33.8 per cent less than 15 years old; this demographic fact alone has enormous implications for future educational attainment and occupational achievement of young Mexicanos. Only 4.3 per cent of Mexicanos are 65 years old and older. Like age, ethnicity has implications for work in Mexico. The country is 60 per cent Mestizo, 30 per cent Amerindian, and 9 per cent Caucasian (The World Almanac, 2001). Mestizos have both Amerindian (i.e., indigenous) and Caucasian (i.e., European, primarily Spanish) blood, and vary in complexion from dark brown to olive to fairskinned, reflecting their ancestral genetic mix (Peterson & Gonzalez, 2000, p. 410). This range in complexion, sometimes called phenotype, is quite common among offspring of same set of Mestizo parents. Darker complected, indigenous-looking Mexicanos are less likely to match educational attainment and occupational achievement of their lighter complected, European-looking siblings. (See also, Arce, Murguia, & Frisbie, 1987.) In Mexico-as in U.S.A. and in Central and South American countries with darker complected Mestizos and indigenous peoples-racism is both an historical and current reality. (See, for example, Mexico: Splendors of Thirty Centuries [1990], pp. 432-433. See also Las Castas Mexicanas/Art and Social Structure in Colonial Mexico/Terminologia [hand-out, available from Roberta Cortez Gonzalez]). Fully three-fourths of Mexico's people live in urban areas (The World Almanac, 2001). The nation's capital, Mexico City, is a teeming megacity of 16 million people (Parfit, 1996a). More recent estimates put metropolitan population at 20 million people (Ai Camp, 2000). Guadalajara, capital of state of Jalisco, is Mexico's second largest city (Parfit, 1996b), with a metropolitan area population of 4 million people. Cities in northern Mexico, especially along Border with U.S., have shown most recent growth. Monterrey, capital of state of Nuevo Leon, has 3 million people (Parfit, 1996e). Juarez, in state of Chihuahua and directly across Border from El Paso, TX, has 1.5 million people (Bowden, 1998). Indeed, Juarez and El Paso, with their combined population of 2 million people (La nueva frontera/The New Frontier, 2001), constitute the most heavily populated metropolitan area on any international border in entire world (Draper, 1995, p. …

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.467
Threshold uncertainty score0.606

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.316
Teacher spread0.278 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it