Ambiguidades e conflitos da cultura patrimonializada no espaço público: o caso do candomblé em Salvador
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A configuração do candomblé no espaço público baiano é um exemplo instigante que sugere que sejam repensados os conceitos de religião e sociedade como domínios relacionais, que não se resolvem nas fronteiras de um espaço público demarcado pela laicidade. O argumento do texto desdobra-se em duas dimensões da mesma questão: por um lado evidenciamos a presença patrimonializada da cultura religiosa afro-brasileira em Salvador; e, por outro, as ambiguidades e conflitos que atravessam esses processos, visibilizando controvérsias religiosas na cultura afro-brasileira que contagiam as culturas urbanas daquela cidade. As circularidades dos símbolos do candomblé em Salvador e suas transgressões para além das fronteiras dos terreiros fazem emergir diferentes configurações do religioso num espaço público intensivo, no qual demarcações pregressas ou oficiais podem esvaziar-se de significado, produzindo arranjos e acomodações instáveis no pluralismo religioso local.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.011 | 0.009 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".