MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2963796616 · doi:10.1051/cocv/2014043

Magnetic spectral bounds on starlike plane domains

2015· article· en· W2963796616 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueESAIM Control Optimisation and Calculus of Variations · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicSpectral Theory in Mathematical Physics
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersBanff International Research Station for Mathematical Innovation and DiscoverySimons FoundationNational Science Foundation
KeywordsLaplace operatorMathematicsDirichlet eigenvalueEigenvalues and eigenvectorsConstant (computer programming)Mathematical analysisUpper and lower boundsDirichlet distributionInvariant (physics)Dirichlet's energyTransverse planeMagnetic fieldPlane (geometry)Boundary (topology)PhysicsGeometryBoundary value problemMathematical physicsDirichlet's principleQuantum mechanicsComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We develop sharp upper bounds for energy levels of the magnetic Laplacian on starlike plane domains, under either Dirichlet or Neumann boundary conditions and assuming a constant magnetic field in the transverse direction. Our main result says that ∑j=1n Φ(λjA/G) is maximal for a disk whenever Φ is concave increasing, n ≥ 1, the domain has area A, and λj is the jth Dirichlet eigenvalue of the magnetic Laplacian (i∇ + (−x2,x1))2. Here the flux β is constant, and the scale invariant factor G penalizes deviations from roundness, meaning G ≥ 1 for all domains and G = 1 for disks.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.777
Threshold uncertainty score0.669

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.290
Teacher spread0.258 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it