MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2963808241 · doi:10.3917/rsr.193.0463

La naissance d’une théologie pratique et pastorale

2019· article· fr· W2963808241 on OpenAlexaff
Gilles Routhier

Bibliographic record

VenueRecherches de Science Religieuse · 2019
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicReligion, Society, and Development
Canadian institutionsUniversité Laval
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPhilosophyArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Vatican II a introduit une nouvelle manière d’élaborer un discours chrétien et d’exprimer la foi chrétienne, mais ce renouveau de la théologie a besoin d’être poursuivi et approfondi si celle-ci ne veut pas être marginalisée, car la situation présente du monde et de l’Église lui lance de nouveaux défis. L’article questionne le rôle du Concile dans cette révolution puis réfléchit aux nouveaux approfondissements exigés dans la situation actuelle. L’enjeu pour la théologie est de demeurer enracinée dans son terreau et de reprendre la question du salut dans le Christ à partir du cri des pauvres et de la terre. S’appuyant certes sur des spécialistes voués au travail théologique, elle ne pourra pas s’isoler du travail d’interprétation menée par les communautés.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.018
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.551
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0180.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.004
Science and technology studies0.0010.005
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.104
GPT teacher head0.397
Teacher spread0.293 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRecherches de Science ReligieuseSame topicReligion, Society, and DevelopmentFrench-language works237,207