Computing automorphism groups of shifts using atypical equivalence classes
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Computing automorphism groups of shifts, using atypical equivalence classes, Discrete Analysis 2016:3, 24 pp. Symbolic dynamics is about dynamical systems of the following type. Let $A$ be an alphabet, and let $\sigma$ be the left shift map from $A^{\mathbb Z}$ to itself. Giving $A$ the discrete topology and $A^{\mathbb Z}$ the product topology, if $X$ is a closed $\sigma$-invariant subset of $A^{\mathbb Z}$, then $(X,\sigma)$ is a dynamical system. Of particular interest are _minimal_ systems of this type: that is, systems where $X$ is the closure of the set of all shifts of a single doubly infinite word $(a_n)_{n\in\mathbb{Z}}$ in $A$. The properties of the word turn out to be interestingly related to properties of the dynamical system. A key parameter for such a system is the _complexity function_ $p:\mathbb{N}\to\mathbb{N}$, where for each positive integer $n$, $p(n)$ is defined to be the number of distinct subwords of the form $(a_m,a_{m+1},\dots,a_{m+n-1})$. In particular, the rate of growth of this function is important. An _automorphism_ of a dynamical system $(X,\sigma)$ is a continuous bijection from $X$ to $X$ that commutes with $\sigma$. A trivial example of an automorphism is $\sigma$ itself, or indeed any power of $\sigma$. In the past few years, there has been a lot of work on showing that dynamical systems $(X,\sigma)$ for which the complexity function grows slowly have automorphism groups that are in some sense small. However, even in the lowest nontrivial complexity (that of nonconstant, sublinear complexity), we do not have a complete understanding of the automorphism group, and in general there is no method that gives a complete characterization of this group. In this paper, the authors focus on the particular class of substitution systems of constant length, which are the systems whose infinite words are obtained by iterating a substitution infinitely many times on some letter in the alphabet. An interesting result in the paper is an algorithm to compute the automorphism group in this situation, along with the use of this algorithm to compute all conjugacies between two shifts generated by constant length substitutions. The proof uses dynamical methods to reduce the problem to combinatorial arguments. Another result is that for a minimal system with complexity that grows at most linearly the quotient of the automorphism group by the group generated by $\sigma$ is finite. It is not clear whether the techniques used in this paper can be generalized to a significantly wider class of systems. However, the difficulty of computing the automorphism group in general is such that any new non-trivial examples are useful and instructive.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it