MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2963814981 · doi:10.1017/s0143385711000824

Approximating entropy for a class of ℤ<sup>2</sup>Markov random fields and pressure for a class of functions on ℤ<sup>2</sup>shifts of finite type

2012· article· en· W2963814981 on OpenAlexaff
Brian Marcus, Ronnie Pavlov

Bibliographic record

VenueErgodic Theory and Dynamical Systems · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicMathematical Dynamics and Fractals
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMathematicsMarkov chainIsing modelEntropy (arrow of time)CombinatoricsType (biology)k-nearest neighbors algorithmSubshift of finite typeStatistical physicsDiscrete mathematicsPhysicsQuantum mechanicsStatistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract For a class of ℤ 2 Markov Random Fields (MRFs) μ , we show that the sequence of successive differences of entropies of induced MRFs on strips of height n converges exponentially fast (in n ) to the entropy of μ . These strip entropies can be computed explicitly when μ is a Gibbs state given by a nearest-neighbor interaction on a strongly irreducible nearest-neighbor ℤ 2 shift of finite type X . We state this result in terms of approximations to the (topological) pressures of certain functions on such an X , and we show that these pressures are computable if the values taken on by the functions are computable. Finally, we show that our results apply to the hard core model and Ising model for certain parameter values of the corresponding interactions, as well as to the topological entropy of certain nearest-neighbor ℤ 2 shifts of finite type, generalizing a result in [R. Pavlov. Approximating the hard square entropy constant with probabilistic methods. Ann. Probab. to appear].

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.268
Teacher spread0.249 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations22
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueErgodic Theory and Dynamical SystemsSame topicMathematical Dynamics and FractalsFrench-language works237,207