Enquêtes nord-américaines sur les violences homophobes et transphobes en contexte scolaire : l’invisibilisation du sexisme
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cet article propose une lecture critique de trois enquêtes réalisées respectivement au Canada anglais, au Québec et aux États-Unis, sur le climat scolaire et les violences interpersonnelles entre pairs fondées sur la non-conformité aux normes sexuelles et de genre, dans le milieu scolaire. Il relève l’ampleur de ces violences, qui peuvent toucher tous les élèves, ainsi que la victimisation relativement plus importante des jeunes trans ou non cisgenres et des élèves dont l’expression de genre est non conforme aux normes de genre. Toutefois, ces enquêtes mettent au second plan l’analyse des violences sexistes ou subies en tant que filles, y compris par les filles non hétérosexuelles, de même que l’examen des auteur·e·s des violences interpersonnelles. Tout en constatant l’enchevêtrement et le caractère systémique des violences liées à la sexualité et au genre, ces études négligent de considérer l’asymétrie entre filles et garçons et le rôle des violences interpersonnelles dans la reproduction des rapports sociaux de sexe.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.031 | 0.031 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.009 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".