MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2963855044 · doi:10.1093/imrn/rnx208

On the motivic class of the classifying stack of G-2$ and the spin groups

2019· article· en· W2963855044 on OpenAlexafffund
Roberto Pirisi, Mattia Talpo

Bibliographic record

VenueIRIS Research product catalog (Sapienza University of Rome) · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicAlgebraic Geometry and Number Theory
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser UniversityUniversity of British Columbia
FundersUniversity of British ColumbiaSimon Fraser UniversityPacific Institute for the Mathematical Sciences
KeywordsMathematicsStack (abstract data type)Group (periodic table)InverseDiagonalCombinatoricsSpin (aerodynamics)ComputationClass (philosophy)Algebraic numberRing (chemistry)Projection (relational algebra)Discrete mathematicsAlgebra over a fieldPure mathematicsGeometryPhysicsMathematical analysisQuantum mechanicsAlgorithmComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We compute the class of the classifying stack of the exceptional algebraic group G2 and of the spin groups Spin7 and Spin8 in the Grothendieck ring of stacks, and show that they are equal to the inverse of the class of the corresponding group. Furthermore, we show that the computation of the motivic classes of the stacks BSpinn can be reduced to the computation of the classes of Bn, where n δ Pinn is the "extraspecial 2-group", the preimage of the diagonal matrices under the projection Pinn δ On to the orthogonal group.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.020

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0050.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0030.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.059
GPT teacher head0.309
Teacher spread0.251 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2019
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIRIS Research product catalog (Sapienza University of Rome)Same topicAlgebraic Geometry and Number TheoryFrench-language works237,207