MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2963857932 · doi:10.1109/access.2018.2889017

The Feasibility of Automated Identification of Six Algae Types Using Feed-Forward Neural Networks and Fluorescence-Based Spectral-Morphological Features

2018· article· en· W2963857932 on OpenAlexafffund
Jason Deglint, Chao Jin, Angela Chao, Alexander Wong

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Access · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicSpectroscopy and Chemometric Analyses
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanada Research Chairs
KeywordsSpectral signatureArtificial intelligenceComputer sciencePattern recognition (psychology)Identification (biology)FluorescenceArtificial neural networkSpectral bandsAlgaeFluorescence microscopeRemote sensingBiological systemOpticsBiologyGeographyEcologyPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Harmful algae blooms are a growing global concern since they negatively affect the quality of drinking water. The gold-standard process to identify and enumerate algae requires highly trained professionals to manually observe algae under a microscope. Therefore, an automated approach to identify and enumerate these micro-organisms is needed. This research investigates the feasibility of leveraging machine learning and fluorescence-based spectral-morphological features to enable the identification of six different algae types in an automated fashion. A custom multi-band fluorescence imaging microscope is used to capture fluorescence data of water samples at six different excitation wavelengths ranging from 405 to 530 nm. Automated data processing and segmentation were performed on the captured data to isolate different micro-organisms from the water sample. Different morphological and spectral fluorescence features are then extracted from the isolated micro-organism imaging data and is used to train neural network classification models. The experimental results using three different neural network classification models (one trained on morphological features, one trained on fluorescence-based spectral features, and one trained on fluorescence-based spectral-morphological features) showed that the use of either fluorescence-based spectral features or fluorescence-based spectral-morphological features to train neural network classification models led to statistically significant improvements in identification accuracy when compared to the use of morphological features (with average identification accuracies of 95.7% ± 3.5% and 96.1% ± 1.5%, respectively). These preliminary results are promising and illustrate the feasibility of leveraging machine learning and fluorescence-based spectral-morphological features as a viable method for automated identification of different algae types.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.045
GPT teacher head0.355
Teacher spread0.310 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations41
Published2018
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE AccessSame topicSpectroscopy and Chemometric AnalysesFrench-language works237,207