MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2963861488 · doi:10.22215/etd/2018-13380

Composed Product and Factorization of Cyclotomic Polynomials Over Finite Fields

2018· dissertation· en· W2963861488 on OpenAlexaff
Zynab Alshareef

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicCoding theory and cryptography
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFinite fieldCyclotomic polynomialMathematicsFactorizationPrime (order theory)Prime powerModuloDivisor (algebraic geometry)Product (mathematics)Field (mathematics)Cyclotomic fieldFactorization of polynomialsPrime factorCombinatoricsPolynomialDiscrete mathematicsArithmeticPure mathematicsMatrix polynomialAlgorithmMathematical analysis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Let $q=p^e$ be a power of prime number $p$ and $\fq$ be a finite field with $q$ elements. Let $\Phi_n$ be the $nth$ cyclotomic polynomial over $\fq$ such that $q$ is congruent to $\pm 1$ modulo each prime divisor of $n$. We use composed products to obtain an explicit factorization of $\Phi_n$ over the finite field $\fq$.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.461
Threshold uncertainty score0.589

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.246
Teacher spread0.237 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicCoding theory and cryptographyFrench-language works237,207