The Longitudinal Short-, Medium-, and Long-Term Functional Recovery After Unstable Pelvic Ring Injuries
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Describe the trajectory of functional recovery for patients with surgically treated unstable pelvic ring injuries from baseline to 5 years. DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. SETTING: Level I Trauma Center. PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS: One hundred eight adult patients with surgically treated pelvic fractures (72% OTA/AO 61 B1-B3 and 28% OTA/AO 61 C1-C3) were enrolled into the institutions orthopaedic trauma database between 2004 and 2015. The cohort was 78% men with a mean age of 44.9 years and injury severity score of 16.9. INTERVENTION: Surgical pelvic stabilization. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Function was measured at baseline and prospectively at 6 months, 1, and 5 years postoperatively using the Short Form-36 Physical Component Score (SF-36 PCS). The trajectory was mapped, and the proportion of patients achieving a minimal clinically important difference (MCID) between time points was determined. RESULTS: The mean SF-36 PCS improved for the entire group between 6 and 12 months (P = 0.001) and between 1 and 5 years (P = 0.02), but did not return to baseline at 5 years (P < 0.0001). The proportion of patients achieving a MCID between 6 and 12 months and 1 and 5 years was 75% and 60%, respectively. The functional level was similar between type B and C groups at baseline (P = 0.5) and 6 months (P = 0.2); however, the type B cohort reported higher scores at 1 year (P = 0.01) and 5 years (P = 0.01). Neither group regained their baseline function (P < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Functional recovery for patients with surgically treated pelvic fractures is characterized by an initial decline in function, followed by sharp improvement between 6 and 12 months, and continued steady improvement between 1 and 5 years. Type B injuries show better early recovery than type C and reach a higher level of function at the final follow-up. Despite the proportion of patients achieving MCID, patients do not regain the preinjury level of function. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".