Dynamic Spectrum Access in Time-Varying Environment: Distributed Learning Beyond Expectation Optimization
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper investigates the problem of dynamic spectrum access for canonical wireless networks, in which the channel states are time-varying. In the most existing work, the commonly used optimization objective is to maximize the expectation of a certain metric (e.g., throughput or achievable rate). However, it is realized that expectation alone is not enough since some applications are sensitive to fluctuations. Effective capacity is a promising metric for time-varying service process since it characterizes the packet delay violating probability (regarded as an important statistical quality-of-service index), by taking into account not only the expectation but also other high-order statistic. Therefore, we formulate the interactions among the users in the time-varying environment as a non-cooperative game, in which the utility function is defined as the achieved effective capacity. We prove that it is an ordinal potential game which has at least one pure strategy Nash equilibrium. Based on an approximated utility function, we propose a multi-agent learning algorithm which is proved to achieve stable solutions with dynamic and incomplete information constraints. The convergence of the proposed learning algorithm is verified by simulation results. Also, it is shown that the proposed multi-agent learning algorithm achieves satisfactory performance.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".