Joint Transceiver Design Algorithms for Multiuser MISO Relay Systems with Energy Harvesting
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this paper, we investigate a multiuser multiple-input single-output relay system with simultaneous wireless information and power transfer, where the received signal is divided into two parts for information decoding and energy harvesting (EH), respectively. Assuming that both base station (BS) and relay station (RS) are equipped with multiple antennas, we study the joint transceiver design problem for the BS beamforming vectors, the RS amplify-and-forward transformation matrix, and the power splitting (PS) ratios at the single-antenna receivers. The aim is to minimize the total transmission power of the BS and the RS under both signal-to-interference-plus-noise ratio and EH constraints. First, an iterative algorithm based on alternating optimization (AO) and with guaranteed convergence is proposed to successively optimize the transceiver coefficients. This AO-based approach is then extended into a robust transceiver design against norm bounded errors in channel state information (CSI), by using semidefinite relaxation and the S-procedure. Second, a novel design scheme based on switched relaying (SR) is proposed that can significantly reduce the computational complexity and overhead of the AO-based designs while maintaining a similar performance. In the proposed SR scheme, the RS is equipped with a codebook of permutation matrices. For each permutation matrix, a latent transceiver is designed, which consists of BS beamforming vectors, optimally scaled RS permutation matrix, and receiver PS ratios. For the given CSI, the optimal latent transceiver with the lowest total power consumption is selected for transmission. We propose concave-convex procedure-based and subgradient-type iterative algorithms, respectively, to design the latent transceivers under perfect and imperfect CSI. Simulation results are presented to validate the effectiveness of all the proposed algorithms.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".