MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2963930887 · doi:10.1109/eusipco.2016.7760353

Robust resource allocation for full-duplex cognitive radio systems

2016· article· en· W2963930887 on OpenAlexaff
Yan Sun, Derrick Wing Kwan Ng, Nikola Zlatanov, Robert Schober

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicFull-Duplex Wireless Communications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCognitive radioComputer scienceRobustness (evolution)Telecommunications linkConvex optimizationBase stationResource allocationMathematical optimizationSemidefinite programmingOptimization problemInterference (communication)Quality of serviceComputer networkWirelessChannel (broadcasting)AlgorithmRegular polygonTelecommunicationsMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, we investigate resource allocation algorithm design for full-duplex (FD) cognitive radio systems. The secondary network employs a FD base station for serving multiple half-duplex downlink and uplink users simultaneously. We study the resource allocation design for minimizing the maximum interference leakage to primary users while providing quality of service for secondary users. The imperfectness of the channel state information of the primary users is taken into account for robust resource allocation algorithm design. The algorithm design is formulated as a non-convex optimization problem and solved optimally by applying semidefinite programming (SDP) relaxation. Simulation results not only show the significant reduction in interference leakage compared to baseline schemes, but also confirm the robustness of the proposed algorithm.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.227
Teacher spread0.192 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicFull-Duplex Wireless CommunicationsFrench-language works237,207