MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2963978065 · doi:10.1137/17m1154667

Nonlinear Nonperturbative Optics Model Enriched by Evolution Equation for Polarization

2018· article· en· W2963978065 on OpenAlexafffund
Marianna Lytova, Emmanuel Lorin, André D. Bandrauk

Bibliographic record

VenueMultiscale Modeling and Simulation · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicLaser-Matter Interactions and Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversité de SherbrookeUniversité de MontréalCarleton University
FundersCompute Canada
KeywordsPhysicsNonlinear systemStatistical physicsHigh harmonic generationPolarization (electrochemistry)ComputationPlasmaNonlinear opticsIonizationComputational physicsQuantum mechanicsLaserMathematicsIonAlgorithmChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this work, we extend and analyze the nonperturbative Maxwell--Schrödinger-Plasma (MASP) model. This model was proposed to describe the high order optical nonlinearities, and the low density free electron plasma generated by a laser pulse propagating in a gas. The MASP model is based on nonasymptotic, ab initio equations, and accurately uses self-consistent description of micro (quantum)- and macro (field)-variables. However, its major drawback is a high computational cost, which in practice means that only short propagation lengths can be calculated. In order to reduce this cost, we study the MASP models enriched by a macroscopic evolution equation for polarization, from its simplest version in the form of a transport equation, to more complex nonlinear variants. We show that the homogeneous transport equation is a more universal tool to simulate the high harmonic spectra at shorter times and/or at a lower computational cost, while the nonlinear equation could be useful for modeling the pulse profiles when the ionization level is moderate. The gain associated with the considered modifications of the MASP model, being expressed in reduction of computational time and the number of processors involved, is of 2--3 orders of magnitude.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.304
Teacher spread0.275 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2018
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMultiscale Modeling and SimulationSame topicLaser-Matter Interactions and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207