MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2963982562 · doi:10.1142/s1793042111004411

A REFINEMENT OF KOBLITZ'S CONJECTURE

2011· article· en· W2963982562 on OpenAlexfundno aff
David Zywina

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Number Theory · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicAlgebraic Geometry and Number Theory
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsMathematicsConjectureElliptic curveSato–Tate conjectureModuloConstant (computer programming)Integer (computer science)Rational numberPrime (order theory)Cardinality (data modeling)Asymptotic formulaabc conjectureCombinatoricsDiscrete mathematicsModular elliptic curveInfinityNumber theoryPrime numberCollatz conjecturePure mathematicsMathematical analysis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Let E be an elliptic curve over the rationals. In 1988, Koblitz conjectured an asymptotic for the number of primes p for which the cardinality of the group of 𝔽p-points of E is prime. However, the constant occurring in his asymptotic does not take into account that the distributions of the |E(𝔽p)| need not be independent modulo distinct primes. We shall describe a corrected constant. We also take the opportunity to extend the scope of the original conjecture to ask how often |E(𝔽p)|/t is an integer and prime for a fixed positive integer t, and to consider elliptic curves over arbitrary number fields. Several worked out examples are provided to supply numerical evidence for the new conjecture.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.043
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.033

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.043
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0030.009
Scholarly communication0.0030.013
Open science0.0030.004
Research integrity0.0030.007
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.050
GPT teacher head0.319
Teacher spread0.268 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations22
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Number TheorySame topicAlgebraic Geometry and Number TheoryFrench-language works237,207