MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2964039265

Design and Analysis of Automatic Motor Blower

2019· article· en· W2964039265 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Jnanesh Kumar, M J Gururaj

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Robotics and Automation · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicIoT-based Control Systems
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAutomotive engineeringBattery (electricity)AlternatorHVACVentilation (architecture)Power (physics)Air conditioningEngineeringComputer scienceMechanical engineering
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The primary objective of automatic motor blower (AMB) is to absorb the heat and maintain the uniform temperature of the vehicle cabin. This mechanism aims to reduce the cabin heat, when the vehicle is parked under sunlight or due to unavoidable circumstances. AMB senses the temperature through inbuilt temperature sensor of the vehicle. It works with a secondary battery and the battery is charged by an alternator. This superior characteristic will be a promising in HVAC (heating, ventilation and air conditioning) system. The purpose of cabin heat neutralization is to maintain a comfortable environment for the occupants and the chauffer while boarding and departing from the vehicle. The vehicles parked under sun heats up easily and causes discomfort on arrive. Normally the Air condition system will be turned on to overcome from the cabin heat. This consumes up to 50% power of the primary battery, additionally this affects the fuel efficiency drastically. AMB helps to maintain the uniform temperature while the vehicle engine is turned off. The AMB will be activated while the vehicle engine is turned off and the temperature sensor reaches the assigned level. The foregoing section contains a brief description of the principle functions and components of AMB. This concept named AMB (Automatic Motor Blower) is designed in CATIA V5 R20 and analyzed using ANSYS 16.0.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.031

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.235
Teacher spread0.227 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Robotics and AutomationSame topicIoT-based Control SystemsFrench-language works237,207