STRUKTURALISME MISTIK: TAHAYUL/MITOS/DONGENG DE SAUSSURE (1857-1913) & ROLAND BARTHES (1915-1980)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
ABSTRAKAliran strukturalisme menjadi bagian pokok hasil kerja Canadian Northrop Frye, yang mempengaruhi teori-teori Amerika yang disebut dengan kritik mistik yang berkembang dari tahun 1940-an sampai pertengahan tahun 1960-an. Peran mistis/myth, dapat memahami hal-hal magis, imaginasi, mimpi, intuisi, dan ketidaksadaran. Myth atau hal mistis dipahami dalam hal kolektif sebagai bagian dari budaya dan kelompok untuk memaparkan sebuah kontek yang bermakna bagi keberadaan manusia. Analisis kritis menguji kandungan-kandungan pesan media, bagaimana teks/bahasa media dikaji, dan bagaimana makna yang dapat dimunculkan dari teks. Gagasan-gagasannya memberi gambaran yang luas mengenai media kontemporer. Barthes merupakan orang terpenting kedua dalam tradisi semiotika Eropa setelah Saussure. Melalui sejumlah karya, ia tidak hanya melanjutkan pemikiran Saussure tentang hubungan bahasa dan makna, pemikirannya justru melampaui Saussure terutama ketika ia menggambarkan tentang makna ideologis dari bahasa yang ia ketengahkan sebagai mitos.Kata kunci: strukturalisme mistik, Saussure, Barthes
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".