MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2964088104 · doi:10.1017/9781787442535.007

The Arundel <i>Coronatio Arthuri</i> : A Middle English Sword in the Stone Story from London, College of Arms MS Arundel 58

2018· book-chapter· en· W2964088104 on OpenAlexaff
David Carlton, Richard J. Moll

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicHistorical and Archaeological Studies
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSWORDFifteenthMiddle EnglishThroneRomanceArtNarrativeBrotherOld FrenchLiteratureAncient historyQueen (butterfly)HistoryClassicsSociologyLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Desperate to find a weapon so that his older brother can participate in a tournament, the young Arthur secretly pulls a sword from a stone and is thus recognised as the King of Britain. This story is ubiquitous today, but in medieval England it was only one of several narratives of how the young king came to the throne. The story is first told around 1200 in the French prose Merlin and this romance, along with the other parts of the Vulgate Cycle, was popular throughout late-medieval Britain. It is perhaps best known through its inclusion in Thomas Malory's late fifteenth-century Morte Darthur , but it is also found in other texts which translate the French Merlin , including Of Arthour and of Merlin (late thirteenth century), Henry Lovelich's verse Merlin (1420s or 1430s) and the Middle English prose Merlin (mid-fifteenth century). One other translation of this scene merits attention. It is found in London, College of Arms MS Arundel 58, a mid-fifteenth-century copy of Robert of Gloucester's Metrical Chronicle . Inserted as an interpolation in its Arthurian narrative, the Arundel Coronacio Arthuri amounts to 398 lines of original Middle English verse and it reveals the complex relationship between the chronicle tradition of King Arthur's reign and the French romance tradition which complemented and, at times, contradicted the historical narrative. The poem also shares features with its fellow English versions of the story, and thus gives us some insight into the circulation of the French prose Merlin in England and the reading habits of the scribe of Arundel 58. Not used extensively by either of the two editors of Robert of Gloucester's Metrical Chronicle , Arundel 58 begins with ‘The tabile offe cronycil offe Engelonde’ and the claim that ‘Thys boke with hys antecedens and consequens was ful ended the vj day offe Auguste the ʒere of oure lorde a Ml CCC. xlviij’ (i.e. 1448). This date may refer to when the text of Robert's Chronicle was brought together with a summarising prologue (i.e. ‘hys antecedens’) and a concluding pedigree of Henry VI (i.e. the ‘consequens’), but the Chronicle could not have been copied much earlier. The text of Robert's verse has been extensively expanded with prose excerpts from a variety of sources including the Middle English Brut , and translations of Geoffrey of Monmouth, William of Malmesbury, John of Glastonbury and others.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.063
Threshold uncertainty score0.126

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0070.004
Scholarly communication0.0050.003
Open science0.0000.002
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0150.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.048
GPT teacher head0.197
Teacher spread0.149 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicHistorical and Archaeological StudiesFrench-language works237,207