MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2964108451 · doi:10.22323/1.358.0471

The expectation of LHAASO sensitivity on the cosmic-ray electron

2019· article· en· W2964108451 on OpenAlex
Sha Sha Wu, S. Z. Chen, H. H. He, Sujie Lin, Y. C. Nan

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of 36th International Cosmic Ray Conference — PoS(ICRC2019) · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicDark Matter and Cosmic Phenomena
Canadian institutionsInstitute of Particle Physics
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhysicsElectronCosmic rayAstrophysicsAstronomyDipoleAnisotropyNuclear physicsOptics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The high-energy electrons suffer severe energy loss during their propagation, owing to the Synchrotron and Inverse-Compton processes. Thus, the electrons exceeding TeV are most likely originating from few local sources, such as dark matter particle and astrophysical sources. The dipole anisotropy of the electrons is also regard as an unique signature about the nearby sources. With the merit of large detecting area and strong background suppression, the LHAASO experiment provides an opportunity on extending the detection of high-energy cosmic-ray electrons from 500 GeV to 100 TeV. In this paper, We explore the efficient rejection of hadronic background of LHAASO, in combination with KM2A and WCDA and make the expectation on the spectrum of cosmic-ray electrons and the sensitivity of dipole anisotropy with LHAASO. The influence on the research of electronic origin is also discussed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.110
Threshold uncertainty score0.711

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.238
Teacher spread0.226 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it