MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2964135470

Structural geology, stratigraphy, and gold deposits of the New Britannia Mining District of the paleoproterozoic Snow Lake arc assemblage (Snow Lake, Manitoba, Canada)

2019· dissertation· en· W2964135470 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Kate Rubingh

Bibliographic record

VenueLu Zone Ul (Laurentian University) · 2019
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicGeochemistry and Geologic Mapping
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAssemblage (archaeology)GeologyStratigraphySnowArchaeologyLake districtGeochemistryMining engineeringGeomorphologyPaleontologyGeographyTectonics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Orogenic gold deposits in the Snow Lake area in the southeastern Trans Hudson Orogen, Manitoba, include the New Britannia deposit which, with a past production of a 1.4M oz Au (43 699 kg), is the largest Proterozoic gold deposit in Manitoba and Saskatchewan. The deposits are hosted by the ca. 1.89 Ga Paleoproterozoic Snow Lake arc (SLA) assemblage of the Flin Flon Glennie Complex (FFGC). The FFGC is bound by a sedimentary basin to the north, namely the Kisseynew Domain. It represents an oceanic protocontinent within an ancestral ocean, the Manikewan Ocean, which occupied the region between three Archean cratons (Hearne, Sask, Superior). The deposits occur within a sequence of explosive, submarine, bimodal volcanic rocks emplaced during an early episode of rifting and subsidence of the SLA. Deformation of these rocks began with their imbrication along brittle thrust faults during a D1 event. It continued during a ca. 1.84- 1.82 Ga D2 event with thrusting of the Kisseynew basin and FFGC above the colliding Sask craton. The D2 event produced a penetrative regional foliation axial planar to map-scale isoclinal folds (NorAcme Anticline), sheath-like gneiss domes along the Kisseynew-FFGC boundary, and regional southwest-directed ductile thrust faults, such as the McLeod Road Thrust. Final collision of the FFGC and Sask craton with the Superior craton during a ca. 1.83-1.80 Ga D3 event reactivated the ductile thrust faults, folded the gneiss domes, and enabled the development of an orogen-parallel regional stretching lineation during lateral flow parallel to the cold Superior craton. The New Britannia deposit and nearby gold deposits were emplaced in the hinge of the Nor-Acme Anticline early during the D2 event, were folded during tightening of the fold, stretched parallel to the regional stretching lineation, and transposed along a late crosscutting shear zone, the Howe Sound fault, which formed as a transfer fault during thrusting. The deposits formed at amphibolite facies conditions during a prograde metamorphic event that culminated during the collision of the FFGC and Sask craton with the Superior craton during the D3 event. Thus, the deposits are atypical compare to most other Proterozoic and Archean orogenic gold deposits which typically form at greenschist facies conditions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.175
Threshold uncertainty score0.352

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.172
Teacher spread0.165 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLu Zone Ul (Laurentian University)Same topicGeochemistry and Geologic MappingFrench-language works237,207