MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2964186386 · doi:10.1117/12.2526858

Camera-based photoacoustic remote sensing microscopy

2019· article· en· W2964186386 on OpenAlexaff
Min Choi, Roger J. Zemp

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPhotoacoustic and Ultrasonic Imaging
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMicroscopyPhotoacoustic imaging in biomedicineRemote sensingComputer visionComputer scienceArtificial intelligenceComputer graphics (images)Environmental scienceMaterials scienceOpticsGeologyPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Photoacoustic remote sensing microscopy is a recently developed optical non-contact imaging method that provides optical absorption contrast in reflection mode. Previously, this was performed by co-scanning of tightly co-focused excitation and interrogation beams. We have demonstrated the proof of principle that superficial optical absorption information can be measured from a scattering sample by a camera in reflection mode using a pulsed excitation and interrogation beams. This allows wide field-of-view absorption imaging in scattering samples in real-time. Using a wire-bonding wire embedded in a phantom, the photoacoustic effect is first induced by a 532-nm pulsed excitation beam which alters the optical property of the wire that is illuminated with a 1064-nm pulsed interrogation beam with 80 ns delay. The scattering of the interrogation beam with and without the excitation beam is captured by the camera and the difference is calculated. Increasing contrast in difference images can be observed as the fluence rate of the excitation beam is set to 5.28 mJ/cm2, 12.8 mJ/cm2, 19.5 mJ/cm2 and 26.0 mJ/cm2. The mean relative difference is increased from 0.92 %, 2.10 %, 2.64 % and 3.27%, respectively.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.020

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.206
Teacher spread0.201 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicPhotoacoustic and Ultrasonic ImagingFrench-language works237,207