MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2964187120 · doi:10.7910/dvn/k7aw6f

Fashion conversation data on Instagram

2017· dataset· en· W2964187120 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueHarvard Dataverse · 2017
Typedataset
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicFashion and Cultural Textiles
Canadian institutionsKootenay Association for Science & Technology
Fundersnot available
KeywordsImpromptuConversationProduct (mathematics)Computer scienceSocial mediaConvolutional neural networkFashion industryAdvertisingWorld Wide WebArtificial intelligenceClothingPsychologyCommunicationBusiness

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Our fashion dataset is composed of information about 24,752 posts by 13,350 people on Instagram. The data collection was done over a month period in January, 2015. We searched for posts mentioning 48 internationally renowned fashion brand names as hashtag. Our data contain information about hashtags as well as image features based on deep learning (Convolutional Neural Network or CNN). The list of learned features include selfies, body snaps, marketing shots, non-fashion, faces, logo, etc. Please refer to our paper for the full description of how we built our deep learning model.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Scholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Dataset · Consensus signal: Dataset
Teacher disagreement score0.242
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1170.359

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.090
GPT teacher head0.291
Teacher spread0.200 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it