Development and Application of High-Performance Frictional Gas Cushion Device
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Recent ultrahigh-tensile-strength steel sheets have become indispensable for improving fuel economy through their incorporation into skeletal parts of automobiles to reduce the weight. To enable the forming of ultrahigh-tensile-strength steel sheets, a high-performance upper cushion is indispensable. The developed high-performance frictional gas cushion device applies as cushion force by frictional force generated by sliding between metal parts of the shaft parts and the hole parts having interference. Frictional cushion force mechanism was added to the upper piston shaft portion of the gas cushion device. In this apparatus, in addition to the repulsive force (gas cushion force) generated by the gas when the piston is pushed into the cylinder, frictional force (frictional cushioning force) due to interference between the inner surface of the cylinder and the outer surface of the piston shaft can be obtained. Therefore, it is possible to obtain a higher cushioning force than that with the conventional gas cushioning apparatus, which generates cushioning force only by the repulsive force of the gas.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".