MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W296419815 · doi:10.5944/epos.30.2014.16108

Los "Escritos de Gobierno", origen de la obra de Nicolás Maquiavelo

2014· article· es· W296419815 on OpenAlexaff
María Teresa Navarro Salazar

Bibliographic record

VenueEpos Revista de filología · 2014
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicHistorical Studies in Latin America
Canadian institutionsActua
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArtPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Los temas de los Escritos de Gobierno discurren a través de toda la obra mayor de Maquiavelo: Príncipe, Discursos, Arte de la guerra, e Historia de Florencia. Son temas heterogéneos que no se agotan en los Escritos, se prolongan en un conjunto de reflexiones donde los problemas afrontados se enfocan de distintas maneras, según el modo de actuar y las circunstancias del momento en que se actúa.I temi di cui si trata negli Scritti di governo scorrono lungo le grandi opere di Machiavelli: Principe, Discorsi, Arte della guerra, e Storia di Firenze. Sono temi che non si esauriscono negli Scritti, bensí vanno prolungati in un insieme di riflessioni dove i problemi ripresi vengono diversamente foccalizzati, seguendo e il modo di agire e le qualità dell'epoca in cui si agisce.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.008
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.848
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.008
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.317
Teacher spread0.308 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEpos Revista de filologíaSame topicHistorical Studies in Latin AmericaFrench-language works237,207