Hybrid Analog and Digital Beamforming for mmWave OFDM Large-Scale Antenna Arrays
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Hybrid analog and digital beamforming is a promising candidate for large-scale millimeter wave (mmWave) multiple-input multiple-output (MIMO) systems because of its ability to significantly reduce the hardware complexity of the conventional fully digital beamforming schemes while being capable of approaching the performance of fully digital schemes. Most of the prior work on hybrid beamforming considers frequency-flat channels. However, broadband mmWave systems are frequency-selective. In broadband systems, it is desirable to design common analog beamformer for the entire band while employing different digital (baseband) beamformers in different frequency sub-bands. This paper considers the hybrid beamforming design for systems with orthogonal frequency division multiplexing modulation. First, for a single-user MIMO (SU-MIMO) system where the hybrid beamforming architecture is employed at both transmitter and receiver, we show that hybrid beamforming with a small number of radio frequency (RF) chains can asymptotically approach the performance of fully digital beamforming for a sufficiently large number of transceiver antennas due to the sparse nature of the mmWave channels. For systems with a practical number of antennas, we then propose a unified heuristic design for two different hybrid beamforming structures, the fully connected and the partially connected structures, to maximize the overall spectral efficiency of an mmWave MIMO system. Numerical results are provided to show that the proposed algorithm outperforms the existing hybrid beamforming methods, and for the fully connected architecture, the proposed algorithm can achieve spectral efficiency very close to that of the optimal fully digital beamforming but with much fewer RF chains. Second, for the multiuser multiple-input single-output case, we propose a heuristic hybrid percoding design to maximize the weighted sum rate in the downlink and show numerically that the proposed algorithm with practical number of RF chains can already approach the performance of fully digital beamforming.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".