MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2964251561 · doi:10.1080/14767058.2019.1647162

Association of the previous history of maternal depression with post-partum depression, anxiety, and stress in the neonatal intensive care unit

2019· article· en· W2964251561 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Anirudha Das, Gloria Gordon-Ocejo, Mohit Kumar, Nitin Kumar, Robert Needlman

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMaternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersCanadian Arthritis Network
KeywordsAnxietyDepression (economics)MedicineNeonatal intensive care unitPopulationPostpartum depressionHistory of depressionPsychiatryHospital Anxiety and Depression ScaleEdinburgh Postnatal Depression ScalePediatricsObstetricsPregnancy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background A history of depression in post-partum women who have infants admitted to the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU), is associated with higher risk for anxiety and stress. These conditions, which can be harmful to neonates, may be missed if maternal mental health screening is confined to depression.Objective To determine if the history of a previously diagnosed depression would be associated with an increased risk of both postpartum depression and other stress-related disorders (i.e. anxiety and stress) among mothers with infants in the NICU.Design Prospective survey questionnaire-based study conducted over a period of 9 months.Setting Urban inpatient hospital-based setting, serving mainly low-income population.Participants A total of 118 mothers of newborns who had been in the NICU for 7–29 days were approached for enrollment. Out of 118, 96 mothers consented to be screened and were asked to fill out the 21-item Depression Anxiety and Stress Scale-21 (DASS-21) questionnaire.Outcome Primary outcome was to determine whether the history of a previously diagnosed depression is associated with an increased risk of both postpartum depression and other stress-related disorders (i.e. anxiety and stress).Results Out of the 96 subjects, 36 (37.5%) had a previous history of depression before delivery (Group A) while 60/96 (62.5%) did not (Group B) and 46/96 (48%) of the mothers were positive for either depression, anxiety, or stress. This included 22/96 (22.9%) mothers who screened positive for depression; 37/96 (38.5%) who screened positive for anxiety; and 32/96 (33.3%) who screened positive for stress. After adjusting for maternal drug abuse, birth weight and maternal gravidity, the association between a previous history of depression and current depression scores were statistically significant (p = .04), as were the associations between previous depression and current anxiety and stress scores (p = .02 and p = .003, respectively).Conclusions and relevance A history of depression, documented in the antepartum medical record, identifies post-partum women who are at higher risk for anxiety and stress. Screening for depression alone may lead to missing these mental health issues.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.035
Threshold uncertainty score0.436

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.253
Teacher spread0.244 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations34
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal MedicineSame topicMaternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and PostpartumFrench-language works237,207