MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2964338635 · doi:10.2172/1568868

Astro2020 APC White Paper: The MegaMapper: a z > 2 Spectroscopic Instrument for the Study of Inflation and Dark Energy

2019· report· en· W2964338635 on OpenAlexaff
David J. Schlegel, Juna A. Kollmeier, G. Aldering, S. Bailey, C. Baltay, C. Bebek, S. BenZvi, Robert Besuner, Guillermo A. Blanc, A. Bolton, Mohamed Bouri, D. Brooks, E. Buckley‐Geer, Zheng Cai, Jeffrey D. Crane, Arjun Dey, P. Doel, Xiaohui Fan, Simone Ferraro, Andreu Font-Ribera, G. Gutiérrez, J. Guy, Henry Heetderks, Dragan Huterer, L. Infante, Patrick Jelinsky, M. Johns, D. Karagiannis, S. Kent, Alex Kim, Jean‐Paul Kneib, Luzius Kronig, Nicholas P. Konidaris, O. Lahav, M. Lampton, Dustin Lang, Alexie Leauthaud, M. Liguori, Eric V. Linder, C. Magneville, Paul Martini, Mario Mateo, Patrick McDonald, Christopher J. Miller, John Moustakas, Adam D. Myers, John S. Mulchaey, Jeffrey A. Newman, P. Nugent, N. Palanque‐Delabrouille, Nikhil Padmanabhan, Anthony L. Piro, Claire Poppett, J. X. Prochaska, Anthony R. Pullen, D. Rabinowitz, Solange Ramirez, Hans-Walter Rix, Ashley J. Ross, Lado Samushia, Emmanuel Schaan, M. Schubnell, Uroš Seljak, Hee‐Jong Seo, Stephen A. Shectman, J. Silber, Joshua D. Simon, Zachary Slepian, M. Soares-Santos, G. Tarlé, Ian Thompson, Monica Valluri, Risa H. Wechsler, Martin White, M. J. Wilson, Christophe Yèche, Dennis Zaritsky

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typereport
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicGalaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena
Canadian institutionsPerimeter Institute
Fundersnot available
KeywordsObservatoryDark energyRedshiftGalaxyPhysicsMeasure (data warehouse)TelescopeLarge Synoptic Survey TelescopeAstrophysicsMultiplexingInflation (cosmology)Remote sensingAstronomyCosmologyComputer scienceTelecommunicationsGeographyDatabase

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

MegaMapper is a proposed ground-based experiment to measure Inflation parameters and Dark Energy from galaxy redshifts at 2¡z¡5. A 6.5-m Magellan telescope will be coupled with DESI spectrographs to achieve multiplexing of 20,000. MegaMapper would be located at Las Campanas Observatory to fully access LSST imaging for target selection.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.074
Threshold uncertainty score0.248

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0030.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0740.091

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.231
Teacher spread0.219 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations22
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicGalaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena→French-language works237,207→